Opinion: On food assistance, we’re flying blind

Opinion: On food assistance, we’re flying blind

Perry Perlmutter (center in blue shirt) stocking a community fridge in the Bronx with day habilitation program participants.

October 13, 2026
City & State NY
Op-ed by Perry Perlmutter and Justin Sanchez

New York City’s frontline food-security providers are stepping up to meet a moment of extraordinary need, keeping families from falling through ever-expanding cracks wrought by new federal SNAP eligibility requirements. Their work is more important and sophisticated than ever before, and they are being asked to do it blind. Without a clear picture of who is losing benefits, where those losses are concentrated and why, providers are forced to respond to a crisis they cannot fully see.

The expanded work rules took effect March 1. Some adults up to age 64 must complete a report on work, training, education or community-service hours unless they qualify for an exemption. After three countable months without meeting the rules, their benefits may stop.

In the South Bronx, where one of us represents residents on the City Council, we hear every day from people losing benefits, both because of the new requirements and because of deep cuts to the federal staff who oversee these programs.

For many of these families, the difference between keeping and losing food assistance comes down to circumstances completely out of their control. Notices go to old addresses. Work hours fluctuate. Shifts are canceled. All the while, their need for food does not change.

New York City’s first response showed what determined outreach can accomplish. City Hall reported in June that its work helped 223,000 New Yorkers maintain SNAP, reducing by 65% the number projected to lose benefits. Yet 40,000 people remained at risk.

Neighborhood providers can help a family get through the week. But they cannot replace the groceries a household can choose and buy with SNAP. As new federal rules put thousands of New Yorkers at risk of losing benefits, New York City must track who falls off the rolls and make trusted neighborhood providers a permanent part of its food-security response.

Those headline figures give us a window into what the city prevented, but not what happened to the people who remained at risk. The administration should continue to publish how many New Yorkers lost SNAP because of the new rules, why they lost it, how many qualified for exemptions and how many later regained benefits. The data should also show where losses are concentrated so outreach can follow the need.

The city also needs lasting capacity to help people navigate the system. The City Council’s fiscal year 2027 budget includes a $1.4 million Food Access and Benefits initiative for SNAP education, screening, applications and recertification help. The administration and council should treat that funding as a foundation, determine whether it is reaching the neighborhoods with the most benefit losses and provide the resources needed to close the gaps.

New York is on the clock. On Oct. 1, the state began a new three-year tracking period. That means some New Yorkers who lost benefits under the old period may be eligible again, if someone reaches them. The Department of Social Services should release the full results from the period that just ended and a plan for reconnecting eligible people now, before the new clock runs down on them too.

The stakes are especially high in the Bronx. The state comptroller found that 20.2% of Bronx residents experienced food insecurity in 2022, the highest rate in the five boroughs. Food prices across the New York City metropolitan area rose 25.2% from 2019 through early 2025. Families were already stretching every dollar before these rules arrived.

At Services for the UnderServed, food security is looked at through the lens of four conditions: availability, access, stability and utilization. The nine community fridges we stock and maintain improve availability and access. They offer low-barrier help close to home, without an application or appointment. SNAP provides stability and choice: the ability to plan meals, shop for dietary needs and buy groceries throughout the month.

Supporters of work requirements argue that they encourage employment, but the evidence should give us pause. A peer-reviewed study published by the American Economic Association found that an earlier rollout sharply reduced SNAP participation among adults subject to the rules but had no effect on employment. In New York City, 82% of single-adult SNAP recipients already had earnings, according to the city. Losing food assistance over a missed notice or reporting step does not create a job or a predictable schedule.

A community fridge can help someone eat tonight. Keeping an eligible household on SNAP gives that household the power to plan for the month. New York should be judged by whether people who qualify can keep the help they need – and frontline providers need the information to see where people are falling through the cracks and respond.

Perry Perlmutter is the president and CEO of Services for the UnderServed. Justin Sanchez is a New York City Council member representing Council District 17 in the South Bronx.

Read the original article here.

If you enjoyed this post get updates. It's free

WordPress Video Lightbox Plugin
X